Twenty-three hours and thirty-eight minutes. That is the median completion time for a YouTube view order here, and it is the number that surprises people most when they come from a platform where likes land in minutes.
What the price range is telling you
A view has to be watched. That single fact sets a floor no API can compress, and it is why almost every line in this category is paced rather than instant. Pacing is also what keeps the delivery inside what the platform treats as ordinary viewing behaviour.
| Line | Per 1000 |
|---|---|
| YouTube Views | Max 1M | Suggested + Browse + Search | Slow Delivery | No Refill | $0.5 |
| YouTube Views | Max 10M | USA | Lifetime Refill โป๏ธ | $10.56 |
The full list, with every line's own delivery figure, is on the YouTube Views page.
How long it actually takes
42 of our 48 YouTube Views services publish a measured completion time. The rest show “Waiting for data” instead of a guess. A blank cell is information too: it means nobody measured it, not that the service is instant.
| Point | Completion time |
|---|---|
| Fastest measured | 3 hours 17 minutes |
| Lower quartile (25%) | 12 hours 2 minutes |
| Median (50%) | 23 hours 38 minutes |
| Upper quartile (75%) | 2 days 0 hours |
| Slowest measured | 4 days 20 hours |
Refill terms
45 of our 48 YouTube Views services carry a refill window in the service name and 3 do not, side by side on the same page. The no-refill line is sometimes the dearer of the two — a guarantee is one input into the price, not the only one.
Country and language targeting
4 of the 48 YouTube Views lines name a country or language in the service name. Targeted services cost more and usually run slower than global ones, because the pool they draw from is smaller. If the audience does not need to match a country, the global lines deliver faster for less. The country pages are linked from the YouTube Views page.
One field stays empty across this category: the drop rate. No supplier behind these lines reports a historical figure, so we leave the cell blank rather than filling it with something plausible. Where a supplier does report one — and some do, elsewhere in the catalogue — we print it, including the unflattering ones.
Where this sits in the catalogue
Ranked by measured speed, this category sits 52 of 55 — slower than the catalogue median of 1 hour 58 minutes. Ranked by entry price it is 31 of 56, against a catalogue floor of $0.0012 per 1000. For scale: the whole catalogue runs to 1,461 services and 1,072 of them publish a measured completion time.
The same product on other platforms
Quoted in the same unit, measured the same way. The prices are not comparable across platforms — they tell you what the audience costs there.
| Category | Services | From | Median time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instagram Views | 14 | $0.0012 | 18 minutes |
| Twitter Views | 36 | $0.0014 | 10 minutes |
| TikTok Views | 22 | $0.06 | 44 minutes |
| Telegram Views | 8 | $0.0614 | 2 minutes |
| Twitch Views | 14 | $1.42 | 2 minutes |
Test before you scale
The smallest real test order in this category costs 0.72 cents — 10 units of a $0.72 per 1000 line. 1 of the 48 YouTube Views services accept orders of 20 units or fewer. There is no argument for learning a new service with volume when the small order is this cheap.
The whole catalogue is on the price list, the checks worth running on any panel are on best SMM panel, and entry prices across every platform are on cheap SMM panel.
Related services
What this article describes, on the price list:
- YouTube Likes — 11 services from $0.51 per 1000
- Instagram Likes — 171 services from $0.0051 per 1000
- Twitter Likes — 16 services from $26.40 per 1000
- TikTok Likes — 13 services from $0.06 per 1000
- SMM services targeted to the USA — the country-targeted part of the catalogue
