Instagram likes start at half a cent. X likes start at twenty-six dollars and forty cents. Same word, five thousand times the floor.
What the price range is telling you
The gap is about what stands behind the action. An X like comes from an account that has to survive a much more aggressive filter, which makes the pool smaller and the replacement cost higher. The narrow band — only forty percent between floor and ceiling — tells you the suppliers all face the same constraint.
| Line | Per 1000 |
|---|---|
| Twitter Likes | Max 2K | Crypto Audience | No Refill | $26.4 |
| Twitter Likes | Max 500 | Brazil | Real Users | No Refill | $36.96 |
The full list, with every line's own delivery figure, is on the Twitter Likes page.
How long it actually takes
14 of our 16 Twitter Likes services publish a measured completion time. The rest show “Waiting for data” instead of a guess. A blank cell is information too: it means nobody measured it, not that the service is instant.
| Point | Completion time |
|---|---|
| Fastest measured | 18 minutes |
| Lower quartile (25%) | 1 hour 17 minutes |
| Median (50%) | 2 hours 40 minutes |
| Upper quartile (75%) | 4 hours 17 minutes |
| Slowest measured | 9 hours 23 minutes |
Refill terms
No line in this category carries a refill window in its name. That is not an oversight — for this product a guarantee would be meaningless, because the count is not the kind of thing that falls back. Judge these lines on delivery time and price instead.
Country and language targeting
8 of the 16 lines name a country or language in the service name. Targeted services cost more and usually run slower than global ones, because the pool they draw from is smaller. If the audience does not need to match a country, the global lines deliver faster for less. The country pages are linked from the Twitter Likes page.
One field stays empty across this category: the drop rate. No supplier behind these lines reports a historical figure, so we leave the cell blank rather than filling it with something plausible. Where a supplier does report one — and some do, elsewhere in the catalogue — we print it, including the unflattering ones.
Where this sits in the catalogue
Ranked by measured speed, this category sits 33 of 55 — slower than the catalogue median of 1 hour 58 minutes. Ranked by entry price it is 53 of 56, against a catalogue floor of $0.0012 per 1000. For scale: the whole catalogue runs to 1,461 services and 1,072 of them publish a measured completion time.
The same product on other platforms
Quoted in the same unit, measured the same way. The prices are not comparable across platforms — they tell you what the audience costs there.
| Category | Services | From | Median time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Instagram Likes | 170 | $0.0051 | 5 hours 9 minutes |
| TikTok Likes | 13 | $0.06 | 3 hours 7 minutes |
| Facebook Likes | 15 | $0.0824 | 19 minutes |
| Threads Likes | 6 | $0.506 | 14 minutes |
| YouTube Likes | 11 | $0.51 | 4 minutes |
| Pinterest Likes | 6 | $3.58 | 3 hours 6 minutes |
| LinkedIn Likes | 12 | $6.79 | 3 hours 9 minutes |
Test before you scale
The smallest real test order in this category costs $0.0264 — 1 unit of a $26.4 per 1000 line. 16 of the 16 services accept orders of 20 units or fewer. There is no argument for learning a new service with volume when the small order is this cheap.
The whole catalogue is on the price list, the checks worth running on any panel are on best SMM panel, and entry prices across every platform are on cheap SMM panel.
Related services
What this article describes, on the price list:
- SMM services targeted to Brazil — the country-targeted part of the catalogue
