SMM PWROpen in the app
Open

LinkedIn Comments: Why They Are Slow and Expensive

LinkedIn Comments: Why They Are Slow and Expensive

1 day 8 hours to the median, and a ceiling of $262.38. This is one of the most expensive comment products we sell and one of the slowest things in the catalogue.

What the price range is telling you

Both numbers come from the same cause: a professional account writing a sentence that other professionals will read. There is no way to automate that cheaply, and the price is what an unautomatable thing costs.

LinePer 1000
LinkedIn Comments Likes | Max 15K | World Wide | Real | No Refill$8.23
LinkedIn Custom Comments | Max 1K | Real | No Refill$262.38

The full list, with every line's own delivery figure, is on the LinkedIn Comments SMM panel page.

How long it actually takes

6 of our 9 LinkedIn Comments services publish a measured completion time. The rest are left blank instead of a guess. A blank cell is information too: it means nobody measured it, not that the service is instant.

PointCompletion time
Fastest measured4 minutes
Lower quartile (25%)16 hours 47 minutes
Median (50%)1 day 8 hours
Upper quartile (75%)1 day 23 hours
Slowest measured2 days 12 hours

Refill terms

1 of our 9 LinkedIn Comments services carry a refill window in the service name and 8 do not, side by side on the same page. The no-refill line is sometimes the dearer of the two — a guarantee is one input into the price, not the only one.

Country and language targeting

3 of the 9 LinkedIn Comments lines name a country or language in the service name. Targeted services cost more and usually run slower than global ones, because the pool they draw from is smaller. If the audience does not need to match a country, the global lines deliver faster for less. The country pages are linked from the LinkedIn SMM panel page.

One field stays empty across this category: the drop rate. No supplier behind these lines reports a historical figure, so we leave the cell blank rather than filling it with something plausible. Where a supplier does report one — and some do, elsewhere in the catalogue — we print it, including the unflattering ones.

Where this sits in the catalogue

Ranked by measured speed, this category sits 50 of 52 — slower than the catalogue median of 2 hours 16 minutes. Ranked by entry price it is 49 of 54, against a catalogue floor of $0.0012 per 1000. For scale: the whole catalogue runs to 2,168 services and 1,610 of them publish a measured completion time.

The same product on other platforms

Quoted in the same unit, measured the same way. The prices are not comparable across platforms — they tell you what the audience costs there.

CategoryServicesFromMedian time
TikTok Comments SMM panel54$0.07944 hours 17 minutes
Instagram Comments SMM panel132$2.53448 hours 48 minutes
YouTube Comments SMM panel17$1.1041 minutes
Pinterest Comments SMM panel5$11.39—
BlueSky Comments SMM panel8$33.005 hours 19 minutes

Test before you scale

The smallest real test order in this category costs 0.823 cents — 1 unit of a $8.23 per 1000 line. 9 of the 9 LinkedIn Comments services accept orders of 20 units or fewer. There is no argument for learning a new service with volume when the small order is this cheap.

The whole catalogue is on the price list, the checks worth running on any panel are on best SMM panel, and entry prices across every platform are on cheap SMM panel.

Related services

What this article describes, on the price list: